The College Faculty

The day before thanksgiving Judge Wolover dismissed the faculty lawsuit, arguing essentially that he has no authority to rule on our case.  His frame of reference was that the Court could not question a business decision (even if it was a bad one), and that the complaint was in the nature of personal services contract issues, and the faculty had other remedies available to them (suing for damages due to breach of contract).  Tuesday December 1, the faculty legal group conferred by phone with Evan Price, our attorney and voted unanimously to move forward immediately with an appeal.  Evan reports that because the judge ruled on a matter of law, not on the facts of our case, that an appeal will be (legally speaking) straightforward.  It will involve a relatively short  brief, and a response to the other side’s brief.  The appeal will move quickly through the appeal court process (20-day intervals for filing, responding, responding to response, and a time certain for the Appellate court) and we could have a decision by April.  Evan thinks we have a good chance of winning our appeal, in which case the complaint would be sent back to Judge Wolover for continuation.

The appeals court consists of a three judge panel, from among the five listed below.  We are in the Ohio 2nd Court, see below.

Ohio Second Court of Appeals:
Appellate Judges:
James A. Brogan
Mike Fain
William H. Wolff, Jr.
Mary E. Donovan
Thomas J. Grady

Clark County Courthouse
101 N. Limestone Street
Springfield, Ohio 45502

Ph.: 937.328.2653
Fax: 937.328.2652

Online resources:
District 2 Opinions
Weekly Docket
Local Rules
found at:
www.sconet.state.oh.us/District_Courts/Districts/dc02.asp

See attached documents for more information:

• faculty-lawsuit-appeal-doc-1
• faculty-lawsuit-appeal-doc-2

The following depositions were recently released.

• Eric Bates Deposition - June 26, 2008 PDF
• Amy Chappell - September 5, 2008 PDF
• Neils Lyster - September 5, 2008 PDF

PDF version available

October 1, 2008

Dr. Tullisse A. Murdock
Chancellor
Antioch University
150 E. South College Street
Yellow Springs, Ohio 45387

Mr. Arthur J. Zucker
Chair, Board of Trustees
Antioch University
2012 Prescott Pl
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615

Dear Chancellor Murdock and Chair Zucker:

Thank you for your letter of last March 21 responding to ours of March 14 (copies enclosed for your convenience). We were tempted to respond at the time, but thought it best to await further developments in the negotiations which were then moving rapidly. Now, with issues remaining unresolved but with a less turbulent situation in the new academic year underway, members of our staff, with the general secretary participating, have once again turned our attention to Antioch. We have come to the view that the closing of Antioch College, whether it proves to be temporary or permanent, is an event the AAUP needs to address. We have agreed that our focus should be upon the governance issues raised by the university’s closing of a core component of the institution and, indeed, its founding college. Among additional issues to be considered are the governance implications for the continuing institution, namely, whether, without the college, Antioch University will operate in accordance with basic principles of academic governance as enunciated in the enclosed Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities. As to Antioch College itself, we shall likely want to address the prospects of whether and in what form Antioch College will resume, and indeed, whether there was a realistic alternative to closing it when that was done.

In situations such as Antioch’s that present developments of basic concern to the academic community, our experience has indicated that it is desirable, in fairness to the institutional administration, to the affected faculty members, and to the institution as a whole, to establish an ad hoc committee composed of persons who have had no previous involvement with the particular matter, to conduct its own full inquiry and prepare a report. The general secretary has accordingly authorized the appointment of such a committee, charging it with reporting to the Association’s standing Committee on College and University Governance.

The following persons have accordingly been appointed to serve as the ad hoc committee charged with investigating the case of Antioch University and the closing of Antioch College:

Professor Diane C. Zannoni, chair
Department of Economics
Trinity College, Connecticut

Professor Ronald G. Ehrenberg
Department of Industrial and Labor Relations and Economics
Cornell University

Professor Rudy Fichtenbaum
Department of Economics
Wright State University

Professor Duane Storti
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Washington - Seattle

We shall welcome your cooperation and shall be back in touch with you when we have dates to propose for a committee visit.

Sincerely,

Anita Levy, Ph.D.
Associate Secretary

Enclosures
cc: Dr. David Caruso, President, Antioch University New England
Dr. Barbara Gellman-Danley, President, Antioch University McGregor
Dr. Neal King, President, Antioch University Los Angeles
Dr. Cassandra Manuelito-Kerkvliet, President, Antioch University Seattle
Dr. Michael Mulnix, President, Antioch University Santa Barbara
Dr. Laurien Alexandre, Director, PhD in Leadership & Change Program Antioch University
Antioch AAUP Membership
Ad hoc Committee

Hi Folks,

The Faculty lawsuit has been moving forward steadily, though quietly. I’ve taken the baton from Peter Townsend in coordinating communication, and thought that we’re way past due in providing an update on the various pieces of the legal puzzle that have been unfolding during the past few months.

a) Some may know that Eric Bates, one of the ACCC negotiators, was deposed June 26th.  Due to the confidentiality agreements between the ACCC and the University in their negotiations, the text of the deposition has not yet been released.  University attorneys are still reviewing the text of the deposition, and it should be released soon.  We’ll post it as soon as it’s made available.

b) The Greene County judge has not yet ruled on the University’s motion to dismiss the Faculty lawsuit.  There is no legal deadline for him to do so, and his ruling could come tomorrow or months from now.

c) We’re moving ahead with depositions, and have scheduled two Trustees to be deposed in early September.  Other Trustees and the Chancellor are in the cue.

d) Faculty counsel sent a request to University counsel for electronic documents on July 11.  Most importantly, the request asked the University to produce all e-mails to and from the Chancellor starting in January of ‘07.  We have received a written response, and should be receiving the documents shortly.  At that point we will have to review what has been released, to examine critical absences, and may have to seek the court’s help in compelling production of relevant electronic documents, including, if necessary, forensic retrieval.

On behalf of the faculty I’d like to thank all of you who have supported us in this legal action.  The process is long and painstaking, and of course very expensive, but I’m convinced that the lawsuit (a) has been a primary force in keeping the Board and University at the negotiating table, and (b) has played a very important role in excavating the Board and University processes that led to the closure of the College.  I hope you will continue to show your generosity in this effort to get at the truth and to bring about an autonomous, viable and thriving Antioch College.  Contributions for the Faculty Legal Fund can be directed to the College Revival Fund folks.

For the Faculty,

Bob Devine

PDF Available

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, OHIO

PETER TOWNSEND, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY,
Defendant.

Case No. 2008 CV 0300
Judge Wolaver

PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

I. INTRODUCTION
The Court should deny Defendant Antioch University’s Motion to Dismiss because Plaintiffs, the tenured faculty members of Antioch College (the “College Faculty”), are not seeking specific performance of the provisions of a personal services contract and they are not asking the Court to step into Defendant’s shoes and make decisions regarding the operation of the College. Rather, the College Faculty seeks specific performance of Defendant’s contractual obligation to implement less drastic measures than closing the College in order to alleviate the College’s financial problems. Specifically, Section IV A 56 of the College’s Faculty Personnel Policies and Procedures (“the Contract”) permits Defendant to declare financial exigency and close the College only when “an imminent financial crisis exists which threatens the survival of the College and cannot be alleviated by less drastic means.” (emphasis added).
Continue Reading »

Hi Folks,

Perhaps, lest I sound like an apologist for Antioch University, I should remind you that I am the lead plaintiff in the faculty lawsuit. I am an advocate for fighting the University in every legal way in order to preserve Antioch College as we all have known it.

Some of you know how strident I have been in trying to persuade all who would listen that no one should consider keeping even a pencil labeled “Antioch College” or “Antioch anything” if the University prevails and the College closes. Much less steal anything the University genuinely values.

Based on how nicely Toni, Andrzej, Lynda Sirk, and Mary Lou LaPierre have dealt with Antioch College this year, if the University prevails I expect to have a search warrant executed to search my apartment for any college “treasure”. If I were stupid enough to have stolen (kept) College (University) property, I probably deserve the legal consequences I am sure Toni and Andrej would gleefully impose on me. Continue Reading »

Thanks for asking, thanks for caring about Antioch.

In order to follow the faculty lawsuit, you kind of need a blow-by-blow.

When we re-filed the suit, we included a motion for a preliminary injunction which would prevent AU from selling anything while the suit was in process. The suit includes a permanent injunction, to be imposed if we win the suit.

The judge decided to have an evidentiary hearing (on April 1) to help him rule on the preliminary injunction.

On Wednesday, 26 March AU deposed Bob Devine. Bob did a great job! Nothing was brought out that we don’t already know about. Continue Reading »

Here’s the latest update: Court Decision - PDF

DEPOSITION OF PAULA TREICHLER - TXT

DEPOSITION OF PAULA TREICHLER - PDF

Below are the PDF & TXT versions of Robert Devine’s deposition on March 26, 2008.

The text version is an export from the PDF and thus is formatted a little strangely.

DEPOSITION OF ROBERT DEVINE - March 26, 2008 - PDF

DEPOSITION OF ROBERT DEVINE - March 26, 2008 - TXT